photo GREENPEACE
Greenpeace has taken issue with Duke Energy?s political contributions to N.C. legislators who have proposed dismissing everyone on current utility and environmental boards.
But a spokesman for Charlotte-based Duke (NYSE:DUK) says the contributions were routine and that the company had no role in developing or proposing the legislation.
Greenpeace researcher Connor Gibson posted a blog item this week detailing about $147,000 in contributions that Duke and Progress Energy have made to some of the bill sponsors. More than $102,000 went to the three primary sponsors, including $65,000 Duke and Progress have contributed to Sen. Tom Apodaca, R-Henderson. The contributions go back as far as 2002, covering six election cycles. State campaign records indicate Apodaca raised almost $1.4 million over those six elections.
About $45,000 went to four of the nine co-sponsors, again dating back to 2002. Duke spokesman Tom Williams says there is no significance to the contributions.
?We routinely contribute to candidates of both parties in races for the General Assembly,? Williams says. ?We have no involvement in developing or proposing the bill.?
New appointments
The bill passed in the state Senate a week ago. It passed its first reading in the state House this week and has been referred to committee. It would dismiss all the sitting members of the N.C. Utilities Commission, the N.C. Environmental Commission, The Industrial Commission and some other boards. It reduces the size of the boards and would allow Gov. Pat McCrory and the Republicans who control both houses to appoint all new board members.
John Downey covers the energy industry and public companies for the Charlotte Business Journal.
Source: http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~r/bizj_charlotte/~3/iC29yXUZkPQ/group-details-duke-energy.html
summer time coolio ricky rubio day light savings time peter paul and mary edgar rice burroughs dallas clark
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন